Tag: meta

Doctor Who Re-watch: Love and Monsters

Doctor Who Re-watch: Love and Monsters

Before I get into this review a quick note on why no episode by episode reviews of Series 11 starring the thirteenth Doctor. Here’s the honest truth: I love Jodie, I don’t mind the visuals or the almost X Files vibe the show has going…

Book Review: The Word is Murder by Anthony Horowitz

Book Review: The Word is Murder by Anthony Horowitz

The Word is Murder Anthony Horowitz Publisher: Harper Collins First Published: August 2017 RRP: $27.99 paperback Anthony Horowitz is one of those authors who has been on my radar for a long, long time. I’ve never read his popular Alex Rider series, but they’ve been…

Doctor Who Re-watch: Listen Review

Doctor Who Re-watch: Listen Review

Disclaimer: In 2013 I reviewed the second half of Series 7 for The Hairy Housewife and fully intended to do the same for Series 8 last year. Unfortunately, it proved impossible. Life and work and caring responsibilities called and at my lowest point, I was about five episodes behind everyone else. After speaking recently with Gemma, she thought it would be cool for me to do a re-tread of Series 8 to tide blog readers over until Series 9 airs. So that’s what’s happening. Every week I’ll re-watch and review an episode for this blog. Feel free to join me! Oh, and there will be spoilers.

This is the sort of episode that reminds me why Moffat is showrunner and deserves to be. This is the sort of episode that makes me think that 50 years from now, Who fans will look back on his work on Who as maverick and genius. Listen is that good. Listen is that brilliant. The story is a return to familiar Moffat territory – the monster hidden in the corner of our eye, blink and you’re gone, turn around and the mystery vanishes – this time though, Moffat spoofs himself whilst waxing philosophical on the nature of fear and why humanity harnesses it. The episode follows two story trajectories: that of The Doctor trying to find the unfindable monster and Clara and Danny trying to move forward in their relationship. It’s hard to summarise the episode without giving everything away for those who haven’t seen it, so be warned, here be entirely meta and spoilers.

The episode begins with meditative Doctor, thinking atop the TARDIS in one scene, studying the animal kingdom in another, using his trademark white chalk to make conjectures and propositions to the audience. There are perfect hunters and perfect defenders, but why is there no such thing as perfect hiding? The Doctor tells us, sending shivers down the spine, that we’d never know if there was a perfect hider because evolution would make it so we’d never see them. With one final piece of logic he asks the audience and ‘the perfect hider’ ‘what would you do?’ as the chalk rolls on the TARDIS floor and the words LISTEN appear. This opening was the moment I decided I ‘got’ Twelve and not only did I ‘get’ him, I damn well liked him a lot. High praise indeed given how much I loved Eleven. Twelve is a thinker and a philosophizer and prizes logic and reason over emotion. It is important to note this. It matters later. For Listen is ultimately two parallel stories that play into each other: the story of The Doctor and his fear of an unsee-able alien and Clara and Danny’s fear of embarrassment and awkwardness in advancing a relationship. Ultimately, the episode claims that both fears are unfounded, but not that those fears are unimportant. Instead, both The Doctor and Clara needed to listen to their hearts rather than their heads.

Then there are seeds of themes which continue throughout Series 8. The soldier thing rears its head again, but this time, it is both Clara and Danny who make assumptions about the other: Clara about Danny’s need to assert to her that he dug 23 wells (as though telling her washes out his guilt) and Danny judging Clara as the lofty, left-wing teacher predisposed to see a violent soldier. The soldier theme ruins their first date and Clara leaves in a huff after harsh words are exchanged. Luckily, The Doctor has called Clara to the TARDIS to deal with his own monsters (presumed to be more than figurative at this stage) because he realises all humanity has the dream of a hand grabbing a foot from under the bed and he can use TARDIS technology to get to that point. This in turn seeds another series 8 plot point, again for Dark Water. Some people criticised Dark Water for the sheer out of character-ness of The Doctor believing that there was a heaven that could be reached by his TARDIS. I never thought he believed it and Listen proves why. The Doctor grins manically when the TARDIS lands after Clara is linked telepathically and says, ‘that’s good. It worked.’ This Doctor suggests mad things not expecting anything to come of them. He’s surprised when fairy stories come true. The final seeded theme for series 8 is the return of Clara Who as the audience and Doctor’s teacher. It is she who tells a frightened Rupert that dreams are called dreams because they are not real. It is she who tells Rupert that clever people can hear dreams. It is she who tells Rupert that an injured soldier can be the best kind of soldier.

Listen is a unique episode in the history of Doctor Who: a story where there is no alien, there is no monster of the week. The only monster is fear itself and Clara, The Doctor and Rupert turn their backs on it (the boy under the covers) even as The Doctor reminds us why fear matters:

Lovely dark… you’d never see the stars without it.

You need to be afraid to be really brave just like you need to be sad to understand happiness.

The gang haven’t quite learnt the lesson yet. Clara tells Rupert a bedtime story about a plastic soldier so brave he doesn’t need a gun to keep the whole world safe, which makes her realize that Danny deserves a second chance. She begs The Doctor for a second chance, but on the date with Danny, she’s too afraid to tell Danny the truth about her time travelling ways and this time it’s him that walks off in a huff. There is no common language. Fear is winning.

And now we get to the reason why, as great as this episode is, it can’t be named as the greatest of all time because the rest of the story relies on two things:

1. The appearance of Orson Pink requires people to watch the whole series and invest in characters beyond a stand alone episode. It is still unanswered who Orson Pink is – is he a descendant of Clara’s child by Danny, is he a descendant of the Afghani boy who presumably was adopted by Clara post Death in Heaven or is he an indication that Danny isn’t definitively dead? The answers could affect the way we view Listen in the future.
2. The final scenes with references to John Hurt’s Doctor, the end of The Time War and The Doctor’s early life have more emotional resonance if you’ve see the 50th and/or know something about The Doctor in classic Who.

I think you could, however, make a case for this episode being one of the greatest Who episodes for fans of the show ever written. This part is why:

The Doctor: What’s that in the mirror? In the corner of your eye? What’s that footstep following? But never passing by? Perhaps they’re all just waiting, Perhaps when we’re all dead. Out they’ll come a slithering, From underneath your bed.
Clara: Did we come to the end of the universe because of a nursery rhyme?

Yes, Clara, yes you did. And later:

What if there was nothing? What if there was never anything? Nothing under the bed, nothing at the door. What if the big bad Time Lord doesn’t want to admit he’s just afraid of the dark.

The Doctor cried as a child and was told he’d never make a soldier or the Time Lord academy. He proves his people wrong because he uses fear, even if only subconsciously, to drive himself forward. This story isn’t about aliens and monsters. It’s about fear: fear of committing emotionally to another person, fear of the dark and of dreams, fear of soldiers and of death, fear of the past, fear of listening to the heart because when you do listen, uncomfortable truths may well be found. And that’s OK, Moffat tells us, in frankly, one of his most touching and beautiful moves yet. It doesn’t matter if there’s nothing under the bed and nothing in the dark, as long as you know it’s OK to be afraid of it. Listen becomes philosophical in a way that Doctor Who seldom is.

Clara’s end speech overlaid by images of people finally learning to listen (The Doctor to Clara, Danny and Clara to each other) is one of the most beautiful endings to any Doctor Who episode I’ve ever seen. I can’t have been the only one who had tears down the cheeks by the time Clara said:

Fear can make you faster, and cleverer, and stronger. And one day, you’re gonna come back to this barn, and on that day, you’re going to be very afraid indeed. But that’s okay. Because if you’re very wise and very strong, fear doesn’t have to make you cruel or cowardly. Fear can make you kind…

There was something moving and beautiful about Clara moving towards Danny to kiss as she said in voice over that fear was a constant companion. In fact, I’m out of words for just how profoundly moving the final moments of Listen are. I’ll leave you with the final lines instead, words to perhaps live by beyond a TV show:

So listen. If you listen to nothing else, listen to this: you’re always going to be afraid, even if you learn to hide it. Fear is like… a companion. A constant companion, always there. But that’s okay. Because fear can bring us together. Fear can bring you home. I’m gonna leave you something just so you’ll always remember. Fear makes companions of us all.

Listen: 11/10 inky stars

Feminist and Loving Moffat Who: Why I am Done (Re)Explaining Part 2

Feminist and Loving Moffat Who: Why I am Done (Re)Explaining Part 2

Midway through last year I began a long essay which was intended to be my definitive stance on Steven Moffat, Doctor Who, female characters and feminism. However, the post soon turned mammoth and I decided to cut my post in half. Besides, enough time has…

Feminist and Loving Moffat Doctor Who: Why I am Done (Re)Explaining Part 1

Feminist and Loving Moffat Doctor Who: Why I am Done (Re)Explaining Part 1

I don’t normally post this sort of piece on my public blog or weigh in on fandom issues here – not because I don’t care about said issues – but because often my livejournal is a better home for such posts. However, Doctor Who fits…

Sydney Writer’s Festival 2012: A Neverending Story: Fantasy Worlds Panel with Isobelle Carmody, Justine Larbalestier, and Scott Westerfeld

Sydney Writer’s Festival 2012: A Neverending Story: Fantasy Worlds Panel with Isobelle Carmody, Justine Larbalestier, and Scott Westerfeld

Yesterday I took notes at the Sydney Writer’s Festival on this panel, so I thought I’d write up a post for those that couldn’t make it. Any mistakes in the notes are my own, as no recording devices were allowed. I tried to only scrawl down things relevent to fantasy generally, rather than parts where authors spoke very specifically about their own work.

A NeverEnding Story was facilitated by freelance reviewer and interviewer, Joy Lawn. Isobelle Carmody is the author of multiple speculative fiction novels and short stories for young adults and adult readers. She is most famous for her Obernewtyn Chronicles, but she has received many awards for her other work, most recently, for her children’s book The Red Wind, also illustrated by Isobelle. Justine Larbarlestier is author of the Magic or Madness trilogy, and debuted with her realist novel, Liar. Scott Westerfeld has written Uglies, Midnighters, and more recently a trilogy of steampunk novels beginning with Leviathan.

Joy: What is speculative fiction and which sub genres have you chosen to write in?

Justine: Everything that isn’t boring- world’s that I’m unfamiliar with. I’ve written Team Human with Irish author, Sarah Rees Brennan.

Scott: World’s with new rules- alternative world’s which really captivate the reader. My latest book, Leviathan, is steampunk.

Isobelle: As a kid I didn’t have tv, or travel, and I lived on housing commission. For me, speculative fiction was anything set in new locations that were unfamiliar to me, like Peru or somewhere, but I also don’t like to label with specific genres.

I like to think that I use certain tools and utensils when I write a story, and for me, speculative fiction embodies the tools and utensils I always come back to.

Travel is really important as a writer. It takes you out of your comfort zone and strips you back to who you really are. My new collection of short stories, Metro Winds, is about mental journey’s, and the metamorphosis caused by travel. You reinvent, and reintepret yourself and your worldview when you’re travelling. Speculative fiction really suits exploring these ideas.

For me, speculative fiction is really about personal philsophical questions. Speculative fiction is speculative.

Joy: What are some key themes in your books?

Isobelle: In Obernewtyn, it’s about why human beings are both so great, and capable of so much greatness, and yet so terrible? What makes humanity the way it is?

Scott: In Leviathan, I wanted to write about airships and tanks, and once I knew that, my setting kind of defined both my genre, and even themes to some extent. Life is super, super messy as it is, and I wanted to explore people’s responsibilities to the world and each other, in terms of the social class and hierachy of World War One, and relationships between poorer and wealthier people.

Justine: My books kind of just grow. I don’t have an outline, they happen. My books are about appearance vs. true personality, and about how people are raised, with the grandmother/granddaughter relationship explored in one of my books. It’s about generational difference.

Joy: Do you toy with realism?

Justine: Yeah, in Liar.

Scott: In So Yesterday, but I found it difficult.

Isobelle: My partner gave me a story for Metro Winds as a birthday gift. He found a miniture circus, and I was so jealous that I wasn’t… only he would find that kind of thing. I used that in one of my short stories in Metro Winds [InkAshlings: The Dove Game]

Well- fantasy comes out of reality- it always leads back to us personally. Speculative fiction isn’t fact, but it IS truth, and they are two different things.

[InkAshlings: Such an interesting point raised by Isobelle here. I had an argument with my history lecturer once about history as a form of story telling which tells the same sort of ‘truth’ as a fiction writer, based off the fact/truth difference. Essentially, don’t historians and authors do the same thing, in revealing truths about the human experience, but using different tools? I would have liked to have heard more on this from the panel]

Scott: In the Ugly Series, eveyone turns beautiful at 16. That story came from a friend who lived in LA after New York, and emailed us about a trip to the dentist. The dentist asked him in all seriousness about a 5 year dental plan, with appearance the emphasis, not health. What if everything was about appearance? was my central question for that series, but that came out of realism, out of reality.

Justine: I’ve used biographical stuff in my stories too, facts from my childhood. I used to live near an Aboriginal settlement, and that has crept into my writing. You can’t write out of nothing. That’s the fun aspect of being a writer. It’s a constant surprise.

Isobelle:  You can also get revenge. I got revenge on a teacher I hated in school, I was so scared of him. I used his name, and described him as bald and ugly, and then one day I actually bumped into him! I tried to avoid him, but he came over and told me how proud everyone was of me!!! He even mentioned how happy he was that I’d used his name, even if the character wasn’t like him at all!!!

Joy: Is that the teacher in The Gathering?

Isobelle: Yes. The Gathering.

Justine: I hated a girl from school, and wrote her into my book.

Joy: Can you tell us a bit about your individual writing process?

Isobelle: Scott sounds organised- you know, perfect histories, languages, maps, charts. Are you?

Scott: Yeah- well… kind of…

Isobelle: I didn’t even have a map for Obernewtyn. The publishers told me I needed one and I had to go back and figure one out. Anyone in the audience who has read Obernewtyn will know how sketchy that map is.

I’m chaos, I don’t take notes, in my mind it’s fluid. Writing it down in plans ruins that fluid creativity.  Sucking the world up is natural, and I do that. It’s like fly paper, you suck things up and it sticks in your brain till you need it.

Scott: The little details had to be correct for a World War One steampunk setting. I did loads of research. In writing, you find out what you don’t know. Like zippers? When were they invented? Wikipedia tells you that, but not when zippers were filtered down to Scottish orphans, did orphans wear zippers in WW1? and I needed to know that. Wikipedia didn’t tell me that.

Research can give narrative. I went on a zeppelin ride as research in Germany, and I found out important minor details, like how balanced the craft has to be, and how carefully people have to move on and off a zeppelin. I needed to know that for Leviathan.

Justine: [InkAshlings: Justine talked about the difficulty of working with another author but I didn’t catch all of this or get it down] Sarah plans everything, she knows the entire plot of novel’s she hasn’t even written yet. It’s mind blowing, and I can’t work like that.

Isobelle: Yeah… but has she written these books yet?

Justine: No… but she has used this method to publish books before.

[Isobelle looked pretty incredulous here. It was quite funny.]

Justine: We had to use a rough outline to compromise. We set ourselves a challenge. I wrote a chapter, and then Sarah discussed it with me, and reworked it, and then we switched and did the same thing forwards and backwards for every chapter. We even kept a catalogue of how many times we laughed reading each others chapters [InkAshlings: Sarah and Justine wrote the paranormal romance comedy, Team Human, together]

Isobelle: [Pulling all kinds of faces] That would kill me. That would absolutely unravel me as a writer.

Justine: Yeah, but it wasn’t my book. It was unique. I’m not sure I would ever do it again. Liar was carefully structured after I wrote the entire manuscript. I used a new program, I hate word… if I ever met Bill Gates… I’m joking. Anyway, I used scriptnet, because I wrote small sections at a time, and replaced sections. I could move index cards around on the computer using scriptnet.

Isobelle: I typed my first book on a type writer. You’re young. I hand write with an ink pen and paper. [to the audience] who here does that still?

[Joy asked for a show of hands on who used scriptnet, word, and wrote by hand from the audience here]

Isobelle: This is really showing my age [upon the lack of handwriting hands in the air]. Actually, I have this funny story. I met a young fan once, and he actually asked me, when was the world black and white? He actually thought the world was literally black and white in the olden days.

[Lots of audience laughter]

Joy: Have you ever created a fantasy world that failed? And what did you do about that?

Justine: I got fired on a ghost writing job once- too many cooks. There was the publisher, the packaging house, the author, the ghost writer, and then me. There were too many contradictary instructions. The world building rules got hopelessly confused.

Scott: I’ve had bad ideas- For example in The Extra’s, I wanted to write from a male perspective, and the book was due in a month. I realised that the male protagonist’s sister was experiencing the entire story, so I asked my editor if I should rewrite the story from her POV. I had to rewrite the world from her perspective in a month because I was seeing my world from the wrong place.

Isobelle: Perfect people are boring in stories. You need them to have flaws.

Joy: You’ve all written about vampires. What makes yours stand out?

Justine: I’ve read loads on vampires- I love and hate them. Dead people walking around freaks me out, it would be so cold, and creepy and horrible, touching a vampire isn’t sexy. The romance aspect repels and compels me. I mean, wouldn’t the vampire smell? They’re dead!

We [Sarah and Justine] wanted to explore the real cost of becoming a vampire, of losing your humanity. In this book [Team Human], vampires can’t laugh or cry.

Scott: I used research on cats. My take was the idea of cats/rats/bats as familiars, but also as carriers of vampirism in Peeps. It spreads to us, to cat lovers, that way. Vampires were parasites. It was the case of a cool book of science becoming an accessable story.

Isobelle: I hate horror. When I was 14, I was so scared of vampires. I used to wrap a towel around my neck, so that the vampire couldn’t bite me, and I shared a bed with my sister, so I used to push her to the outside, so the vampire would get her first. I’d pull the covers right up. There was no way that vampire was getting me!

I’m not a fan of horror, so I didn’t plan to write it. I got inspired by a sentence from an old battered guide book I found on Santorini. “Bringing vampires to Santorini is the same as bringing coal to Newcastle.”  I wrote a vampire short story inspired by that, and by the island setting. [Story in Metro Winds, called, The Stranger- IA] When I sent the story to my editor, it was really strange, because they got another story from a British author inspired by the exact same quote!

Well- the thing I do like about vampires is immortality. I like that idea. I like the idea of being around to see things happen. I don’t like the idea of everyone going on without me, without having any kind of impact [InkAshlings: Ha Isobelle! You have your own massive wikipedia page and published books. Stop worrying on this front] So yeah- I wrote a horror short story… but I don’t think I’d be likely to write in that genre again.

Three questions were solicited from the audience now, and I was first up.

InkAshlings: Do you think that because fantasy is removed in setting from reality, it allows you to talk with more ease about difficult issues in society, that maybe people wouldn’t normally want to talk about, or wouldn’t feel comfortable dealing with, in a realist novel?

Justine: Yes. I mean, especially in America, where there is a small, but very vocal book banning minority. I know so many people who wouldn’t have been banned if they had been writing in the speculative fiction genre. It’s less confronting maybe? Sad but true. I know someone who was banned for depicting a very G rated lesbian relationship. I guarantee if that had been fantasy, it would have been ok.

[InkAshlings: I didn’t actually intend the question to go down the censorship route but it was interesting anyway. I was more asking about the way that imagination allows for uncomfortable truths to be aired in ways that challenge a reader, in a way that maybe can’t happen in realist novels.]

The second audience question was directed at Isobelle, and asked about her series Little Fur, and its relation to fairy story traditions.

Isobelle: I wrote the Little Fur series after a big flood in Prague, and there were things everywhere, all the debris, and cracks in the pavement. I was walking with my daughter, and she asked me what was in the cracks, so I told her trolls, and she asked, ‘what kind?’ so I said, ‘big, scary trolls.’ It went from there.

Metro Winds is realist, but I use the ornate language of fairy stories to tell these realist stories.

Justine: Fairy stories are a huge influence on fantasy authors. Myths and legends, and fairy stories…

Isobelle: They use rich symbols that are repeated over and over again. When I asked (with Nan McNab) various authors to contribute fairy stories to our Tales from the Tower compilation [InkAshlings: The Wilful Eye, and The Wild Wood] they all said yes, without even asking about money and stuff. It’s just… they… fairy stories tap into something that resonates with the human psyche.

Joy: Any questions for Scott?

Audience Question: Where do you go visually for world building ideas and perceptions? How do you visualise a world?

Scott: I really learnt about the value of illustrations and designs. The collaborative value of working with artists really means… the story happens with those extra dimensions.

Thanks to all three authors, and to Joy, for such a great event! If you want to support Australian fantasy, and you liked what these authors discussed, why not check out their websites, and grab a book?

Fantasy- what exactly are we talking about?

Fantasy- what exactly are we talking about?

It has occurred to me that we haven’t gone all meta on fantasy at this blog yet, which is odd, seeings as this entire blog is premised on the role of fantasy, as a branch of speculative fiction, in human society. I did a quick google of…